YES 0.642
H-Termination proof of /home/matraf/haskell/eval_FullyBlown_Fast/empty.hs
H-Termination of the given Haskell-Program with start terms could successfully be proven:
↳ HASKELL
↳ LR
mainModule Main
| ((filter :: (a -> Bool) -> [a] -> [a]) :: (a -> Bool) -> [a] -> [a]) |
module Main where
Lambda Reductions:
The following Lambda expression
\vu39→
case | vu39 of |
| x | → if p x then x : [] else [] |
| _ | → [] |
is transformed to
filter0 | p vu39 | =
case | vu39 of | | x | → if p x then x : [] else [] |
| _ | → [] |
|
↳ HASKELL
↳ LR
↳ HASKELL
↳ CR
mainModule Main
| ((filter :: (a -> Bool) -> [a] -> [a]) :: (a -> Bool) -> [a] -> [a]) |
module Main where
Case Reductions:
The following Case expression
case | vu39 of |
| x | → if p x then x : [] else [] |
| _ | → [] |
is transformed to
filter00 | p x | = if p x then x : [] else [] |
filter00 | p _ | = [] |
↳ HASKELL
↳ LR
↳ HASKELL
↳ CR
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
mainModule Main
| ((filter :: (a -> Bool) -> [a] -> [a]) :: (a -> Bool) -> [a] -> [a]) |
module Main where
If Reductions:
The following If expression
if p x then x : [] else []
is transformed to
filter000 | x True | = x : [] |
filter000 | x False | = [] |
↳ HASKELL
↳ LR
↳ HASKELL
↳ CR
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
mainModule Main
| ((filter :: (a -> Bool) -> [a] -> [a]) :: (a -> Bool) -> [a] -> [a]) |
module Main where
Replaced joker patterns by fresh variables and removed binding patterns.
↳ HASKELL
↳ LR
↳ HASKELL
↳ CR
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
mainModule Main
| ((filter :: (a -> Bool) -> [a] -> [a]) :: (a -> Bool) -> [a] -> [a]) |
module Main where
Cond Reductions:
The following Function with conditions
is transformed to
undefined0 | True | = undefined |
undefined1 | | = undefined0 False |
↳ HASKELL
↳ LR
↳ HASKELL
↳ CR
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
mainModule Main
| (filter :: (a -> Bool) -> [a] -> [a]) |
module Main where
Haskell To QDPs
↳ HASKELL
↳ LR
↳ HASKELL
↳ CR
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ QDP
↳ QDPSizeChangeProof
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_foldr(vy3, :(vy40, vy41), ba) → new_foldr(vy3, vy41, ba)
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem. From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- new_foldr(vy3, :(vy40, vy41), ba) → new_foldr(vy3, vy41, ba)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 > 2, 3 >= 3